Skip to content
Effortmark: Better forms and surveys (logo)

Effortmark

Better forms and surveys

Main Navigation

  • Home
  • Hire me
  • Speaking
  • Forms
  • Surveys
  • Design
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact me

Author: Jane Matthews

Making a better web form

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 25 November 2004
Making a better web form

Which usability changes make the biggest difference? Invited by LoanBright to review their forms, we were surprised by some of the results. Among the changes we tested –  layout, wording of questions, addition of extra pages – the only one to make a significant differenceContinue reading… Making a better web form

Usability test reports – your chance to influence a new standard

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 24 October 2004
Usability test reports – your chance to influence a new standard

What do you think about international standards such as ISO 13407 or ISO 9000? Necessary but dull? Expensive but important? Irrelevant to daily life? I’m not going to pretend that these documents are ever going to compete with Harry PotterContinue reading… Usability test reports – your chance to influence a new standard

Five factors for choosing forms software

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 10 October 2004
Five factors for choosing forms software

At any time there are dozens of forms products on the market so how do you choose the right option for physically creating your form?  In this paper for the Business Forms Management Association Symposium, I explore five areas you need toContinue reading… Five factors for choosing forms software

How not to get a job in usability

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 31 July 2004
How not to get a job in usability

Way back in 1982, a powerful television series called Boys from the Blackstuff added a new catchphrase to the British vocabulary: “gizza job”. A key character, Yosser Hughes, had a torrid time trying to find a job in Liverpool duringContinue reading… How not to get a job in usability

Blink, scroll, flicker: three ways to ruin your website (and possibly make it illegal)

Jane Matthews 16 February 2021 31 March 2004
Blink, scroll, flicker: three ways to ruin your website (and possibly make it illegal)

A client’s web team were looking sadly at the ‘scrolling news’ feature they were forced to carry on many pages. “We hate it, we want to get rid of it, but we need evidence”. So I’ve done a bit ofContinue reading… Blink, scroll, flicker: three ways to ruin your website (and possibly make it illegal)

It’s time to make a bigger pond

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 28 February 2004
It’s time to make a bigger pond

“Very short sessions on usability testing could be bad for the profession”. It was another of those discussions that I have from time to time, where I know that we’re not going to reach an agreement but I’m trying toContinue reading… It’s time to make a bigger pond

Dos and don’ts of web traffic measurement

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 29 January 2004
Dos and don’ts of web traffic measurement

Last week I was deep into one of my favourite things: brooding on web traffic data. And it got me thinking about the joy of measurement – particularly in the context of making websites easy to use. Usability testing isContinue reading… Dos and don’ts of web traffic measurement

Four ways to lose an order (and one way to get one)

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 2 January 2004
Four ways to lose an order (and one way to get one)

A week before Christmas I was shopping online, as usual, but this time with some relatively clear requirements rather than purely as a displacement activity from the important business of writing a report. These were the requirements: delivery before ChristmasContinue reading… Four ways to lose an order (and one way to get one)

Flash is 99% good (for the right audience)

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 30 November 2003
Flash is 99% good (for the right audience)

A few years ago, Jakob Nielsen got a lot of attention with his “Flash: 99% bad” alertbox.  At the time, I thought that it was a bit extreme. Why not allow ad agencies, graphic designers and movie sites to indulgeContinue reading… Flash is 99% good (for the right audience)

Piggy in the middle? Why people choose the midpoint in rating questions on questionnaires

Jane Matthews 12 December 2019 25 August 2003
Piggy in the middle? Why people choose the midpoint in rating questions on questionnaires

Questionnaires often ask us to rate something or other. Recently, I’ve been asked about: ♦ my satisfaction with a huge website ♦ the effectiveness of a selection of ways to maintain or increase charge-out rates ♦ the cleanliness of aContinue reading… Piggy in the middle? Why people choose the midpoint in rating questions on questionnaires

Posts pagination

Previous Page 1 … Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Next

Primary Sidebar

Latest Blog Posts

  • Rosenverse webinar: Measuring error rates to get ready for AI17 February 2026
    Caroline delivers a webinar for Rosenverse 2026 on data quality and error rates, with suggestions and resources for tracking both
  • My research on error rates and data quality17 February 2026
    In 2025, I focused mostly on error rates and data quality. I did a series of workshopsContinue reading... My research on error rates and data quality
  • Garbage in, garbage out: Workshop at SDinGOV 202521 October 2025
    My topic for 2025 is ‘error rates and data quality’, and it was a pleasure to haveContinue reading... Garbage in, garbage out: Workshop at SDinGOV 2025

RSS Feed

Footer Menu

  • Home
  • Hire me
  • Speaking
  • Forms
  • Surveys
  • Design
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact me

@ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License

Theme by Suri